Me 2.0 » Posts in 'Jobs' category

The 47-year rain delay

When I spied the black-and-white

notebook with COMPOSITIONS on the

cover, I immediately knew what it was. A

quick look through the pages of box scores

told the story of part of the Summer of

1962, at least as it looked from a backyard

in Linwood, N.J.

But the page that caught my eye was

the lineup for a game that was never

played: sort of a Wiffle Ball version of

Beethoven’s Unfinished Symphony

.

That summer, my brother Bob and I

waged a Wiffle Ball Home Run Derby

battle that pitted the Yankees (Bob’s

team) against the Phillies (my team). Our

Home Run Derby was patterned after the

TV version featuring major leaguers, which

meant it was all or nothing. If the ball

didn’t clear the string we had connected to

trees across the perimeter of the outfield,

it was an out.

Because my brother is 6½ years older –

at the time, I was 8 and he was 14 or

15 – it’s not surprising that the Yanks

won all nine games of the series, by an

aggregate score of 58-35.

The 10th game was to be a matchup of

aces (OK, one ace vs. one journeyman):

the Yankees’ Whitey Ford (now in the Hall

of Fame) vs. the Phils’ Cal McLish. We

kept a box score and statistics on the

games, and in checking them I discovered

that Ford already had three wins and

racked up 40 strikeouts in the process. My

brother always threw a little harder when

Ford was pitching, but I did manage to get

back-to-back HRs in one game against

him (Frank Torre and Bob Oldis, of all

people).

For the never-played game, my level of

desperation was apparent in the lineup I

had cobbled together: Tony Taylor, Ted

Savage, Roy Sievers, Johnny Callison,

Bobby Wine, Tony Gonzalez, Jim Coker,

Ruben Amaro, McLish. Wine hitting fifth?

Coker? Amaro? I must have been going

with lefty-righty percentages. But why had

I benched Don Demeter, a righty who had

power, and used both Wine AND Amaro,

two guys who predated the Mendoza Line?

I must have been desperate to sit out

lefty swinger Wes Covington, who had my

all-time favorite batting stance to copy –

hunched over, bat parallel to the ground,

right elbow pointing straight toward the

pitcher. Bob and I were both switch-

hitters, so we emulated each player’s

stance (short of Taylor crossing

himself before he batted). When my sons

were younger and I played ball with them,

I frequently used the Covington stance.

They, of course, looked at me as if I were

nuts.

The only lefties I had in the lineup were

Callison and Gonzalez, “Little Dynamite,”

whose bat waggle also was fun to copy.

Callison had five homers in nine games to

lead the Phils in our series, but still had

only half as many as Mickey Mantle and

Clete Boyer.

I’ve been trying to remember why the

10th game was never played, and I’ve

come up with some theories:

The loss in the ninth game was

especially heartbreaking: 7-5 in 13

innings. The Phils had fought back to tie it

in the bottom of the ninth on a two-out

homer by Roy Sievers.

They tied it again in the bottom of the 12th

on a blast by Covington (my man!). But

Art Mahaffey, who was apparently the

Phillies pitching staff’s sacrificial lamb,

surrendered gopher balls to Hector Lopez

and Bill Skowron in the top of the 13th,

and that was it.

I can remember running inside crying

after some defeats, but we usually ended

up back outside for another game.

Perhaps this time Mahaffey’s lackluster

performance had pushed me over the edge.

Another theory involves the string that

marked the home run line. I can recall one

night about dusk that my father was

returning from a visit with the neighbors

and he clotheslined himself on said home

run boundary. I think we put the string

back up, but maybe I saw his mishap as

my opportunity to bow out gracefully.

It could have been that Bob realized it

wasn’t cool for a teenager to be playing

Wiffle Ball with his kid brother, or else he

just tired of the lack of a challenge.

Looking back now, I realize it was

pretty remarkable for him to spend that

much time with me at all during his

teenage years.

Whatever the reason, when I found

the notebook I thought that playing the

game would be a good idea. But there

were a few obstacles, the biggest of which

is that the vacant lot where we played is

no longer vacant. That means no matter

where we played, it’d be impossible to

duplicate the conditions.

Another obstacle is distance. Bob still

lives in South Jersey, about 15 minutes

from where we grew up. But I now live

outside Atlanta. I usually make it to New

Jersey only one or two times a year.

To be honest, though,age may be the

biggest reason I haven’t continued

pursuing the idea. I’m now 55 and Bob is

61. Clearly, our best Wiffle Ball days are

behind us.

I found out several years ago that I have

arthritis in both my shoulders. My right

(non-throwing) arm is even worse than my

left. I can still throw sidearm with some

accuracy, but little velocity. But overhand

deliveries are out of the question. These

days, my pitches aren’t just fat; they’re

morbidly obese.

Besides, I hate to burst my older

brother’s bubble. I can remember how

much joy I got when I got taller than him

and was finally able to defeat him at

basketball. I thought that suffering a

Home Run Derby loss after a winning

streak that had spanned 40-plus

years would be too much for him.

The notebook didn’t have any dates

listed, but I turned to The Baseball

Encyclopedia to figure out the games were

played in 1962. That was the only year

that the two teams had some of these

players on their rosters.

In real life that year, the Yanks went

109-53 and won the World Series over the

Giants. The Phils went 81-80 and finished

in seventh place. Mahaffey did much

better than in our back yard, leading the

real-life Phillies staff with 19 victories.

I guess it was better we played our

series in 1962 than 1964. If I had been the

Phils that season, the end – just as in real

life, when the Phillies collapsed down the

backstretch and lost the National League

pennant to the St. Louis Cardinals —

would have been even more painful, I’m sure.

My 15 minutes of (semi) fame

Spending a few days as a movie extra is a fun diversion and a source of a little income during a job search. But I don’t see myself pulling up stakes and moving my family to Hollywood to launch a new career on the big or small screen.

Besides, if I did establish a foothold in Tinseltown, I’d probably be typecast as an overweight, middle-aged, bald guy and not have an opportunity for meatier roles.

I worked on a TV movie called “My Fake Fiance,” about a couple who stages a fake wedding in order to collect the gifts. Melissa Joan Hart and Joey Lawrence are the stars. I didn’t have to audition, only to e-mail my interest (and a photo) in response to a posting on Craig’s List. The movie debuts Sunday, April 19, at 8 p.m. on ABC Family Channel.

I spent three days on the set, the first in an outdoor restaurant/park scene in Buckhead, the last two in a wedding scene at Peachtree Christian Church in Atlanta. The movie was shot last fall in a number of locations around Atlanta.

My wife encouraged my acting debut and even endured my jokes about hiring an agent and joining the Screen Actors Guild. My teenage sons were, I think, mildly embarrassed by the idea. Of course, teenagers are routinely embarrassed by their parents, so this was no surprise.

When extras are confirmed to work a particular day, they are given a call time and some directives on wardrobe. Those include, depending on the scene, the types of clothes and recommended colors. Also, they include colors you should not wear (in our case, white, red or black). And the emphasis is on NO LOGOS. When I was sitting at the table in the restaurant scene, one of the assistant directors even turned my inexpensive watch so the logo wouldn’t be visible.

Extras are supposed to bring several clothing options, and when the wardrobe person checks you over, she or he tells you what works and whether you need to change. Sometimes nothing you have is OK, and you have to get some clothes from wardrobe. This happened to a lot more people in the church wedding scenes, but I passed muster.

My call time for the first day was noon, much more palatable than the next two days for the wedding scenes (6:30 a.m. and 7 a.m., respectively). We assembled in the Lenox Square parking lot and were taken by van to a nearby business park, where a fake restaurant had been set up in front of a small park.

I quickly discovered that much of an extra’s time is spent waiting – for a scene to be set up, for lighting to be moved, for just about everything. They tell you to bring a book, for good reason.

For this movie, extras were paid $100 a day, and workdays last 12 hours on average. Breaking that down to an hourly rate left me depressed, so I chose to look at it in terms of being paid for the amount of time I was actually in front of the camera. I estimated that the first day, I was in a scene for about three minutes; at $100 for three minutes, that works out to $2,000 per hour. Much better, and I’m not even a SAG member.

I was seated at a small restaurant table with three other extras (in real life, an Agnes Scott law professor, an AirTran flight attendant and an aspiring actor). In the scene, we pretended to look at menus and make recommendations to one another as the stars talked at the bar.

Along with all the restaurant patrons and workers, extras in this scene included people in the park – joggers, cyclists, children playing soccer. We were all background and were set in motion when the assistant director called “background!”

After about five or six takes, we were done, and they moved some tables, cameras and lights around for the next scene. Our table was gone, so we had to watch and wait. There were snacks such as animal crackers on hand for the extras, but we weren’t supposed to approach the table with the better food (the sign said CREW ONLY: NO EXTRAS). For all I know, the table was surrounded by one of those invisible electric fences that keep dogs in a yard; if we got too close, we might get zapped.

After a few hours, we were reseated, only to be ousted again as the camera filled the spot where our table had been. It turned out we were “wrapped” (done for the day), after I had worked only six hours.

The next morning, I got up before 5 a.m to make my 6:30 a.m. call time at Peachtree Christian Church. I had to wear wedding attire for these scenes, and after waiting in a long line for wardrobe, I was told to change into my second option for a shirt. Fortunately, the rest of the clothes I brought were OK.

There were about 200 extras for the wedding scene (many more than the previous day), so preparation took a lot of time. We all went to the makeup artist, who spent a few minutes taking the shine off my forehead and face.

The last day, along with makeup, I actually had to pay a brief visit to the hairstylist. “You need a little control,” he said as he brushed the few remaining strands I have. Tell me about it, pal. He obviously knew about my job search.

The two days at the church were mostly spent shooting the wedding scenes from several different camera angles. I was in the next-to-last row the first day, but had an aisle seat as the actors came down the aisle for the processional.

Extras were told not to bring cameras on the set, although I saw a few people sneaking pictures in between takes. I’m also told extras aren’t supposed to speak to the actors; the actors certainly didn’t speak to us.

For the second day of shooting at the church, we had to wear the same clothes (my wife washed my shirt) and take the same seats. But they ended up moving everyone in our row to the same row on the other side of the church as the scene was shot from the back. I’m eager to see the movie to find out if I’m visible in two places.

Shooting the wedding scenes went on until 8 p.m. the first day. Someone talked about how we get time-and-a-half for anything after 12 hours. I got excited until I realized that was still short of $13 an hour for that day. Fortunately I was able to nod off in the pew a few times in between takes. Nothing like getting paid for sleeping.

The end of the wedding called for all the extras to stand up and cheer. By 8 p.m. I would have stood on my head in order to be “wrapped” for the day.

At 7 a.m. the next morning, the guy in charge of extras greeted us this way: “Hey, background…I read somewhere that if you’re operating on four hours’ sleep or less that it’s equivalent to a .2 blood-alcohol level. I know we’re all a little drunk this morning, but it’s gonna be a good day.” (I actually got about seven hours’ sleep, so I didn’t qualify.)

I ended up seeing the same wedding about eight times. The second day at the church ended for me at 3 p.m., before I even had a chance to get sleepy.

In our copious down time, I learned that some extras do this kind of work extensively. There are a lot of movies, TV shows, videos and commercials shot in Atlanta, so I imagine that one could stay reasonably busy. Of course, some people see it as a chance to get discovered. I don’t count myself in that group.

The movie “Get Low,” starring Robert Duvall, has been shooting recently in locations around Georgia and using a lot of extras. My wife made her own extra debut by spending a day on that set. Other local movie opportunities for extras of late included “Zombieland” and “The Preacher’s Kid.”

I learned a little about moviemaking in my brief visit to the land of extradom. I was amazed at how many people work on the set. There’s even someone to bring in slippers for the star to wear between takes so she can take off her high heels.

I found out about a lighting trick that I guess is used in locales with high ceilings, such as the beautiful interior of Peachtree Christian Church. Lights are put inside these huge fabric cubes that are floated up by helium balloons and controlled by pulleys. They can be moved around with relative ease, although I was nervous about the church’s real lights when I was watching this process.

In the middle of my 13-hour day, I was certain this would be my one and only extra experience. But a few days later, I was calling the casting office and telling them I’m available if they needed me again.

Deja vu to the nth degree

If you’ve seen the movie “Groundhog Day,” in which Bill Murray is trapped in an endless loop of Feb. 2s, you have a little insight into the life of the employment-challenged. Talk about settling into a routine! It’s get up, eat breakfast, check and send e-mails, scrounge through job sites, send online job applications, check and send e-mails again, eat lunch, look  forward to mail truck’s arrival, lather, rinse and repeat. And repeat. And repeat.
One good thing about the sorry state of the economy: There are plenty of people to commiserate with. I had lunch today with an unemployed friend and I told him how I had asked my wife not to ask me, “How was your day?” Even though she always asks in a loving way and I know she’s interested, I feel guilty when the only answer I can give is, “Well, I emptied the dishwasher, but other than that it was uneventful.” I knew he could relate.
Part of my initial reluctance to establish this blog was the mind-set that I’d be giving away for free something that had (at least in my mind) a monetary value. I’ve finally accepted that exposure can have a benefit beyond the bank account. I tried to market this one piece a number of places without success, so I finally offered it to a Syracuse basketball blogger. It had a time element, so I couldn’t wait any longer. He posted it today, and it’s gotten a number of comments, which makes me happy. Here’s the link;

http://www.syracuse.com/axeman/index.ssf/2009/01/pearls_shot_25_years_later.html

Glamor reserved for other media

In the post-Watergate era, many budding journalists envisioned  themselves as the next Woodward or Bernstein and looked for a scandal  around every corner. But the newspaper business, especially in a small town, is far less glamorous than that. Sometimes it can be downright hard.

In the small North Carolina town where I first worked, I was shooting the breeze with the police chief in his office one day when a call came in on the police scanner about a child being hit by a car. I drove out to the location and was greeted by a horrific scene: A 12-year-old girl lying dead by the side of the road next to her crumpled bicycle, as her grieving mother knelt over her body and wailed. Just thinking about it now puts me on the verge of tears.

I was only 22 or 23 at the time, and this was my first journalistic experience of this nature. My first reaction was to feel as if I had to throw up, but then I remembered I was a newsman and I had my camera. I was in position to get a picture that would capture the raw emotion of the scene and would certainly run on the front page.

Before I could push the shutter, though, a wave of disgust came over me. I felt like an intruder, invading the privacy of this mother and daughter no less than if I had stood outside their home and peered in the window. I took no pictures. I just stood there and watched as authorities covered the girl’s body and drove the mother away in a squad car, as she leaned her head out the window and continued wailing.

When I got back to the office, another reporter asked what had happened. When I told her about the picture I couldn’t take, she was incredulous, and said it would have been a prize-winner. I sincerely doubted she could have taken the picture, either, but that wasn’t the point. I figure that although I may have lost a little of my journalistic credibility, I preserved all of my humanity.

Journalism roots run deep

I really had no choice but to go into newspapers. I grew up in Linwood, N.J., next door to the editor of the local weekly paper. The neighbor on the other side owned and operated a service station, so clearly I picked the less lucrative career. Good thing I didn’t grow up next to an ax murderer, I guess.

Perhaps it was through some form of osmosis, but by the time I was in elementary school, I knew I wanted to make newspapers my career. At age 10, I started a neighborhood paper with one of my friends. Gary and I one-finger-typed it on portable typewriters (you know, those things that are all in museums now), using a carbon, and went door-to-door in the neighborhood, selling them for a nickel. I actually did this for a few summers; we were responsible for our own amusement a lot more in the pre-Playstation days.

Our paper contained “news” you wouldn’t find in any other publication (with good reason, I suppose). When my mother had a tooth pulled, it was front-page news in the Crestlea Park Press. When Gary’s dog, Taffy, had an operation, we reported it without the indelicate details. We lifted riddles from a book (c’mon, who would sue a child for copyright infringement?) and included several. Here’s one I remember:

Q. Who is bigger, Mr. Bigger or Mr. Bigger’s baby?

A. The baby is a little Bigger.

People actually paid for this stuff! And a nickel was big money in the mid-’60s.

We included Little League standings, and my team was in capital letters, the same way big-city papers handled standings for their hometown baseball teams.

One time in July 1965, we actually had breaking news in the paper. Gary and I were busily churning out an issue when we heard that Adlai Stevenson had died. Along with the neighborhood news in The Crestlea Park Press was this: “Flash! Adlai Stevenson just died. They will perform an autopsy.”

Context wasn’t important to us at that age; besides, we probably didn’t even know who he was. We heard on TV that he had died, so we figured he must have been important.

I can’t remember if the breaking news helped our sales that week. Our customers were loyal, but they DID have other sources for news.

On the outside, looking … somewhere

For someone whose whole professional life – more than 32 years — has been wrapped up in newspapers, the outside is a strange place to be. Having “ink in your veins” used to be a compliment for a veteran journalist, but now it’s just as likely to represent someone in need of a transfusion.

Well, that’s what I’m all about. My recent departure, through buyout, from a newspaper I had called my home for nearly 19 years has necessitated this change. I think most journalists would acknowledge that the best days of newspapers in their print form are in the past. Newspapers are still trying to figure out the best ways to make money in the online world. As the Internet has taken off, many journalism careers (and not just in the newsroom) have landed. Some have crashed and burned.

The challenge? Reinvent myself. I don’t want to be the human equivalent of 8-track tapes. I don’t want to be obsolete. At 54, I have a lot of creative juices still eager to flow.

I am starting this blog not only as an outlet for some of those creative juices, but also because I know there are many others in career limbo who are attempting to find a place to grab on in the new job market. For those of you in that group, I hope I can give you a little inspiration, a little background about my journalistic life, and maybe make you laugh occasionally.

Kevin Braun

Stepping gently into unfamiliar territory

One thing I quickly learned is that searching for a job is nothing like what it was the last time I did it, in 1989. When colleagues and friends found I was leaving my newspaper job, the first question inevitably was, “What are you gonna do?” I hated to give the answer “I have no idea,” although that would probably have been the most accurate. I did actually have some ideas, but nothing concrete, and I looked forward with some trepidation to the new chapter.

I accepted the newspaper’s buyout because I considered it the best option for myself personally and professionally, and for my family. The buyout was a generous offer, but I felt as if I was at a buffet full of food choices that I really didn’t like (hard to imagine, for anyone who’s seen me). I had to eat something, but nothing had my tastebuds panting.

I went to a career counseling workshop shortly after I left my job, and our class learned that people who experience job loss go through stages similar to the grief cycle as outlined by Elizabeth Kubler-Ross. They were proposed in roller-coaster form, which I quickly discovered is accurate. A job seeker’s mood and outlook can change with just a morsel of hope, perhaps something as simple as an e-mail response that isn’t automated.